首页> 外文OA文献 >Tourism Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): Proposal of a New Methodological Framework for Sustainable Consumption and Production
【2h】

Tourism Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): Proposal of a New Methodological Framework for Sustainable Consumption and Production

机译:旅游生命周期评估(LCA):关于可持续消费和生产的新方法框架的建议

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Tourism has become an important part of modern life styles, besides being one of the largest and fastest growing economic sectors worldwide, in spite of occasional shocks over the last decade (UNWTO 2010). Tourism’s contribution to the gross domestic product (GDP) is – when direct contribution and multipliers are included - estimated at up to 10% in some advanced, diversified economies. However, this strong growth also implies an increase of undesired environmental impacts. Tourism is globally responsible for 5% of all carbon dioxide emissions, the most important greenhouse gas causing climate change (UNWTO UNEP WMO 2008). However, in terms of radiative forcing, the direct measure for contribution to climate change, tourism even could have share of up to 12.5% (Scott et al., 2010). Also, the greenhouse gas emissions of tourism are estimated to grow at a rather large rate, while a globally emissions should be reduced with up to 80% by 2050 (e.g. Scott et al., 2010). Finally, it has been shown that the eco-efficiency – the economic contribution per ton emissions – of tourism is rather low (Gössling et al., 2005). Theses data totally clash with the view, actually slightly common to many re¬searchers in the past, according to which tourism is a low environmental impact industry (McCrory 2006). Now, it is a shared concept that tourist activities are strongly related to the environment, since, on the one hand, the natural environment itself may be consid¬ered as a major input resource to the processes of tourism industries, and, on the other hand, the development of tourism as a mass industry may severely increase its overall impact on the environment (Butler 2004; Raggi and Petti 2006; Romeril 1989). Given the predictions of an increased role of tourism industries in the world economy, the environmental aspects of, and impacts gen¬erated by tourist activities should be accurately considered according to a Life Cycle Thinking perspective. This concept has been extensively advocated as the proper way of addressing the challenges linked with sustainable development, and, in particular, with those measures for enhancing sustainable consumption and production. In the framework of sustainable development policies, the “Sustainable Consumption and Production and Sustainable Industrial Policy (SCP) Action Plan” (European Commission 2008) is a building block in the EU.In line with this policy, a wide range of environmental instruments have been developed so far for assessment and labelling/certification purposes of travel and tourist services. This ongoing proliferation of different initiatives shows a high degree of diversity in terms of scope, assessment methodologies and means and tools of communication. Although this proliferation reflects the vast variety of travel and tourist products and the complicated nature in assessing their environmental performance, these environmental instruments seem to suffer from a lack of integration and standardisation or quality control. This situation has the potential to confuse or even mislead travellers and the stakeholders within the industry. Research questions were:- What environmental instruments and initiatives are currently supporting the application of the European Sustainable Consumption and Production (SCP) Action Plan in the travel and tourism industry? - What are their key characteristics and how do they stand in relation to Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) principles? - How can these instruments be combined in a general framework capable to render this industry low carbon and more sustainable from an environmental point of view?
机译:尽管在过去十年间偶尔受到冲击,但旅游业已成为现代生活方式的重要组成部分,是世界上最大,增长最快的经济部门之一(联合国世界旅游组织,2010年)。在某些先进的多元化经济体中,如果将直接贡献和乘数因素包括在内,旅游业对国内生产总值的贡献估计可达10%。但是,这种强劲的增长也意味着不希望的环境影响的增加。旅游业是全球二氧化碳排放总量的5%,二氧化碳是引起气候变化的最重要的温室气体(联合国世界旅游组织环境署WMO 2008)。然而,就辐射强迫而言,对气候变化贡献的直接量度,旅游业所占份额甚至高达12.5%(Scott等,2010)。此外,估计旅游业的温室气体排放量将以相当大的速度增长,而到2050年,全球排放量应减少80%(e.g. Scott等人,2010)。最后,研究表明,旅游业的生态效率(每吨排放的经济贡献)相当低(Gössling等,2005)。这些数据与观点完全冲突,这实际上是过去许多研究人员所普遍认为的,根据该观点,旅游业是对环境影响很小的产业(McCrory 2006)。现在,旅游活动与环境密切相关是一个共同的概念,因为一方面,自然环境本身可以被视为旅游业过程的主要投入资源,另一方面另一方面,旅游业作为大众产业的发展可能会严重增加其对环境的总体影响(Butler 2004; Raggi and Petti 2006; Romeril 1989)。鉴于对旅游业在世界经济中作用日益增强的预测,应根据“生命周期思考”的观点,准确考虑旅游活动的环境因素和由此产生的影响。广泛提倡这一概念,是解决与可持续发展,特别是与那些增强可持续消费和生产的措施有关的挑战的正确方法。在可持续发展政策的框架内,“可持续消费和生产及可持续工业政策(SCP)行动计划”(欧洲委员会,2008年)是欧盟的基石。根据该政策,广泛的环境手段到目前为止,已开发用于旅行和旅游服务的评估和标签/证明目的。各种举措的不断扩散表明,在范围,评估方法以及交流手段和工具方面存在高度差异。尽管这种扩散反映出旅行产品和旅游产品的种类繁多,以及评估其环境绩效的复杂性,但这些环境手段似乎缺乏一体化,标准化和质量控制之苦。这种情况有可能混淆甚至误导旅行者和行业内的利益相关者。研究问题是:-目前有哪些环境手段和倡议支持《欧洲可持续消费和生产(SCP)行动计划》在旅游业中的应用? -它们的主要特征是什么?与生命周期评估(LCA)原则相比,它们的立场如何? -从环境的角度来看,如何将这些工具结合到一个能够使该行业实现低碳,更可持续发展的通用框架中?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号